RISK CRANKING FAILS OOS

Prop-Firm Risk Calibration — Why 0.5% Was the Only Robust Setting

The fastest way to blow a prop-firm challenge is to over-risk a real edge. This experiment tested the same strategy at three risk levels and found only the smallest one survived out-of-sample.

0.5% — 6mo DD
5.2%
1.5% — 6mo DD
12%
Safe-profile PF
1.16
Verdict
0.5% only

The test

Identical strategy, three position-sizing settings: 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5% risk per trade, evaluated on both a 6-week real-tick sample and a 6.4-month OHLC sample.

The result

At 0.5% risk the strategy held a 5.2% six-month drawdown and a 1.16 profit factor — comfortably inside typical prop-firm limits. At 1.5% the drawdown ballooned to 12% and the edge broke down out-of-sample. Only 0.5% was robust across both samples.

Why

Higher risk doesn't just scale returns — it scales variance faster than expectancy. A strategy with a genuine but modest edge can survive small position sizing and drown at large sizing, because a normal losing streak now breaches the drawdown cap before the edge can recover.

The rule

Size for the drawdown, not the dream. If your edge only looks good at 1.5% risk, you don't have an edge — you have leverage. Prop-firm-safe means the strategy passes at a risk level that respects the daily and total loss caps.

Want the EA and the full walk-forward dataset?
The free pack includes the MIDAS EA (30-day trial + unlimited backtesting) and Module 0. The full course ships all 8 experiments, the 32-fold dataset, and the production MQL5 source. Get the Free Pack →

FAQ

How much should I risk per trade for a prop firm?
In our test only 0.5% risk per trade stayed robust across both samples while respecting drawdown limits; 1.5% failed out-of-sample.
Why does higher risk fail out of sample?
Higher risk scales variance faster than expectancy, so a normal losing streak breaches the drawdown cap before the edge can recover.